TWO MASSACRES. ONLY ONE MAKES THE NEWS.
The massacre at Fort Hood this week has made headlines around the world. As it should. Contrast this event, however, to the massacre of union leader Margarito Montes Parra and 14 family members and associates in Sonora, Mexico last week. The Parra event barely broke through the background news noise. The Times and some other big papers covered it but it barely caused a blip on the average American's radar screen.
We're at a point where wholesale slaughter in Mexico is the norm rather than the exception. We've slowly been de-sensitized to Mexican drug violence to a point where it will take a 9/11 type event to finally wrap the public's head around the fact that Mexico is augering in like a lawn dart. And if it goes, we'll be sharing the border with a nation that resembles Afghanistan more than it does Canada.
While the Ft. Hood killings were the product of a single whack job (motivated by a combination of Islamist ideology and mental problems) the Parra massacre was clearly an orchestrated event involving numerous shooters, surveillance, intel and communications operators. In the rural area where Parra was killed, you can't rely on cell phones to stage a tracking and ambush operation. The killers probably had military-grade comms equipment and the necessary discipline and cold-blooded determination to kill not just Parra but his wife and children.
This kind of violence speaks of organization, training and singular intent. These are skills not easily obtained and require a great deal more training than required for a drive-by shooting or a carjacking. In the spectrum of violence, the Parra massacre, as cowardly as it was, ranks fairly high - just a few shades off a political assassination.
If history is anything to go by, the investigation into the Parra massacre will yield zero results. Those ultimately responsible will never be caught, or even named. And the stage will be set for an even bigger body count.
The big fear, or course is that this level of paramilitary organized violence will eventually seep across the border. As Mexico has been de-sensitized, we're been also being immunized to body counts. Eight years after the Twin Towers fell, we've got a significant portion of the population that has already given up the fight and urging the administration to do something other than kill the Islamists responsible for 9/11. If 3,000 plus dead isn't enough to sustain a vigorous search and destroy mission, how quickly will those same people shy away from a fight when only a dozen or so civilians are cut down by a cartel assassination squad on U.S. soil?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Wally, do you really believe the U.S government wants those responsible for 9/11 brought to justice?
I remember listening to a CIA agent talking on the radio( OK insert joke here) about how the US has had at least 7 opportunities to kill Bin Laden and both Clinton(before the attcks) and Bush (after the attcks) declined to take him out.
This reminds me of a joke I recently heard.
Is it just me, or does anyone else find it amazing that during the Mad Cow epidemic our government could track down a single cow, born in Canada almost 3 years prior to the epidemic, right to the stall where she slept in the state of Washington? And they tracked down her calves to their stalls too...But they are unable to locate 20.1 million illegal aliens wandering around our country. Maybe we should give them all a cow.
OK , bad joke but some of that rings true. The same goes for Swine Flu. They tracked it down to some poor little kid in Mexico and narrowed it down to the pig that started spreading the H1N1 but we can't find Bin Laden in Pakistan? I don't think our government wants to find Bin Laden or anyone else responsible. They just catch a new guy every once and a while to justify a war that's been going on far too long without any results.
LOL. Wally do you realize the Google Ads on your front page are all for medical pot?
Post a Comment